AFC TEAMS _ THE HIGHS AND LOWS of POSITIONAL Team Based PPR POINTS.

By -

AFC TEAMS _ THE HIGHS AND LOWS of POSITIONAL Team Based PPR POINTS.


A decision aid using color and denoting High and Low in % of Predicted PPR Distributions
in the AFC.

The table above the figure is showing the overall averages. These are the numbers used in the HIGH/Low designation.

Red stained cells highlight the predicted lowest numbers % of Predicted PPR Distributions the AFC and NFC.

Green staining cells are the highest numbers of % of Predicted PPR Distributions the AFC and NFC.

The exploding doughnuts (previous post) gives you an overview while this way shows the abnormal predictions.

TABLE 1

Note in Table 1 we see at BAL the RBs are going to be emphasized relative to other teams and within the offense.

Note the data on BUF indicates a weak QB but strong RB and that will be the balance of that team's offensive attack!




photo Slide06_zpscoagvywg.jpg

TABLE 2

Note in Table 2 we see that KC has a shift to the RB vs the WR which are below average.

See that JAC has a predicted TE usage above the average. That could be a source for a late round TE pick.

I leave it to use these further.

photo Slide07_zpsvurphiqy.jpg

Reactions:

Popular posts from this blog

Running Backs and their 2016 Passing Targets and Rushing Attempts. Scaled Numbers with Rushing to Pass Ratios, Bias Analysis

By -
Image
Working my Chapter X1 Data in my Textbook on Drafting. Shooting for the 2017 First Edition in May on Amazon. 
Drafting Textbook Data Figures.
In these tables, I looked at the Running Backs and their 2016 Passing Targets and Rushing Attempts.

I calculated a Scaled Scoring System for 0 to 100 and assigned the players their numbers of Rushing vs Passing.

I also calculated a Rushing to Passing Ratio Stat and assigned each player an R/P number

Finally, all of the 2016 active Running Backs were sorted by their R/P number and their biases determined.

Passing Biased - RBs that had a Passing Score higher than their Rushing Score.

Rushing Biased - RBs that had a Rushing Score Higher than their Passing Score

Balanced - RBs whose 2 Scores were close to each other.







Read more

Post Draft MFL 10 ADPs_Player Risk and Ranks_Draft Pick Advantages_Numerous Action Packed Data Figures!

By -
Image
I have updated the MFL10 ADPs from data after the draft as well. I urge you to question all data points to understand the why. This is the wisdom of the crowds as it is based on MFL10 ADPs but it is a starting point for your investigations.

These next figures present each position, the FPR (Fantasy Professors ADP Ranking) and my risk number Early Risk. Red color not good while green is good! 

Example question. In the QBs the 3rd QB Brady has a high risk number relative to his draft neighbors. Why? What is the public as a group telling us? 
















Next up is 2 figures that I use to see the entire draft. I use landscape level visual aids to make moves etc before the crowd. Questions such as when do I need to draft a TE or QB if I do not wish to have a player positional ranked at 13th or worse. So in TEs you can wait to at least round 8 to 9. QB2s start at round 10 as well! So in you draft plan going into a MFL10, plan for TEs and QBs in rounds 7 to 9 etc. 








These figures are landscape figures that …
Read more