AFC TEAMS _ THE HIGHS AND LOWS of POSITIONAL Team Based PPR POINTS.

By -

AFC TEAMS _ THE HIGHS AND LOWS of POSITIONAL Team Based PPR POINTS.


A decision aid using color and denoting High and Low in % of Predicted PPR Distributions
in the AFC.

The table above the figure is showing the overall averages. These are the numbers used in the HIGH/Low designation.

Red stained cells highlight the predicted lowest numbers % of Predicted PPR Distributions the AFC and NFC.

Green staining cells are the highest numbers of % of Predicted PPR Distributions the AFC and NFC.

The exploding doughnuts (previous post) gives you an overview while this way shows the abnormal predictions.

TABLE 1

Note in Table 1 we see at BAL the RBs are going to be emphasized relative to other teams and within the offense.

Note the data on BUF indicates a weak QB but strong RB and that will be the balance of that team's offensive attack!




photo Slide06_zpscoagvywg.jpg

TABLE 2

Note in Table 2 we see that KC has a shift to the RB vs the WR which are below average.

See that JAC has a predicted TE usage above the average. That could be a source for a late round TE pick.

I leave it to use these further.

photo Slide07_zpsvurphiqy.jpg

Reactions:

Popular posts from this blog

Running Backs and their 2016 Passing Targets and Rushing Attempts. Scaled Numbers with Rushing to Pass Ratios, Bias Analysis

By -
Image
Working my Chapter X1 Data in my Textbook on Drafting. Shooting for the 2017 First Edition in May on Amazon. 
Drafting Textbook Data Figures.
In these tables, I looked at the Running Backs and their 2016 Passing Targets and Rushing Attempts.

I calculated a Scaled Scoring System for 0 to 100 and assigned the players their numbers of Rushing vs Passing.

I also calculated a Rushing to Passing Ratio Stat and assigned each player an R/P number

Finally, all of the 2016 active Running Backs were sorted by their R/P number and their biases determined.

Passing Biased - RBs that had a Passing Score higher than their Rushing Score.

Rushing Biased - RBs that had a Rushing Score Higher than their Passing Score

Balanced - RBs whose 2 Scores were close to each other.







Read more

Early MFL10s 2017 ADPs with rankings and risk analysis.

By -
Image
These data tables will give a look at the current MFL10 ADP and Risk .    I wrote about using my MFL 10 data in a post last year.       See this link MFL Data Past Post Read Me
The Next 6 Charts show QB, RB, TE and WR Data from the current MFL10 ADPs see 
Pos Num = ADP of the Player within their position
ADP Num = ADP within all 150 Players looked at
Player, Team, and Position. 
Scaled Public Ranking from 100 to 0 (Best - Green and Worst -Red)
Very Early Risk Number (My Risk Analysis from 0 no Risk to 100 Highest Risk). I try to incorporate, elements for the player and team. I will fold in SOS and injury history data later













A landscape view of the current MFL10 ADPs by position. 
Red circle marks the end of the 12th TE or QBRed Arrows mark the RBs rounds of 12Yellow Arrows mark the WR rounds of 12The first 12 TEs are off the board on average in round 10 The first 12 QBs are drafted on average by round 10 as well.The first 12 RBs at round 3, next 12 at round 6 and next 12 RBs by round 9.The f…
Read more

Week 15 Rankings With Risk Analysis ___ PPR and NON PPR Positional Breakdown

By -
Image
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Thefantasygreek.com/fantasy-football-analytics/




-=============================================


Please visit the link above to see my other articles! 


My player rankings (FSP Rankings) are simple rankings on a scale from 100 (Best at the Position/GREEN) to 0 (Worst at the Position RED).

My Risk Rankings are a guide to whether a player's rank is easily predictable. Weekly Volatility! 

(Low Risk would imply Stable Rankings while High Risk implies a High Volatile Ranking)

I will update later in the week based on late breaking information if needed



Read more