Fantasy Football Analysis 2017
Fantasy Football Rankings. Dynasty and Redraft League Information
Computational Methods for Fantasy Football Analysis.
Winning at Fantasy Football. Fantasy Football Sleepers.
Hot Fantasy Football Rankings.
PHD Level Data Analysis with a commonsense viewpoint. My Textbook on FF drafting @ amazon
Subscribe to this blog
Follow by Email
DST, QB, RB, and WRs. Who are our Sleepers and Anti-Sleepers? JULY 1 Update
Who are our Sleepers and Anti-Sleepers? JULY 1 Update
We present our updated ranking. We give you the Pros and Joes views of the player (Insider and Outsiders). We give you our most important stat is DIFF stat which a measurement of Sleeper vs Anti-Sleeper potential!. Green Staining in the DIFF column implies a value pick (Sleeper), Red Staining is Anti-Sleeper non-value player pick.
The color staining in the I and O columns denote the ranking from High to Low, positive to negative.
So a sleeper rated high by the Pros is superior to players not supported.
All tables give you the Position, PROs rating, JOEs rating, DIFF sleeper/anti-sleeper ranking, DIFF ranking from top sleeper at 1 to the worst anti-sleeper at -48, and predicted round these picks may goat for a 18 round draft.
Working my Chapter X1 Data in my Textbook on Drafting. Shooting for the 2017 First Edition in May on Amazon. Drafting Textbook Data Figures.
In these tables, I looked at the Running Backs and their 2016 Passing Targets and Rushing Attempts.
I calculated a Scaled Scoring System for 0 to 100 and assigned the players their numbers of Rushing vs Passing.
I also calculated a Rushing to Passing Ratio Stat and assigned each player an R/P number
Finally, all of the 2016 active Running Backs were sorted by their R/P number and their biases determined.
Passing Biased - RBs that had a Passing Score higher than their Rushing Score.
Rushing Biased - RBs that had a Rushing Score Higher than their Passing Score
Balanced - RBs whose 2 Scores were close to each other.
These data tables will give a look at the current MFL10 ADP and Risk .
I wrote about using my MFL 10 data in a post last year.
See this link MFL Data Past Post Read Me
The Next 6 Charts show QB, RB, TE and WR Data from the current MFL10 ADPs see Pos Num = ADP of the Player within their position ADP Num = ADP within all 150 Players looked at Player, Team, and Position. Scaled Public Ranking from 100 to 0 (Best - Green and Worst -Red) Very Early Risk Number (My Risk Analysis from 0 no Risk to 100 Highest Risk). I try to incorporate, elements for the player and team. I will fold in SOS and injury history data later
A landscape view of the current MFL10 ADPs by position. Red circle marks the end of the 12th TE or QBRed Arrows mark the RBs rounds of 12Yellow Arrows mark the WR rounds of 12The first 12 TEs are off the board on average in round 10 The first 12 QBs are drafted on average by round 10 as well.The first 12 RBs at round 3, next 12 at round 6 and next 12 RBs by round 9.The f…
I have updated the MFL10 ADPs from data after the draft as well. I urge you to question all data points to understand the why. This is the wisdom of the crowds as it is based on MFL10 ADPs but it is a starting point for your investigations.
These next figures present each position, the FPR (Fantasy Professors ADP Ranking) and my risk number Early Risk. Red color not good while green is good!
Example question. In the QBs the 3rd QB Brady has a high risk number relative to his draft neighbors. Why? What is the public as a group telling us?
Next up is 2 figures that I use to see the entire draft. I use landscape level visual aids to make moves etc before the crowd. Questions such as when do I need to draft a TE or QB if I do not wish to have a player positional ranked at 13th or worse. So in TEs you can wait to at least round 8 to 9. QB2s start at round 10 as well! So in you draft plan going into a MFL10, plan for TEs and QBs in rounds 7 to 9 etc.