Posts

Showing posts from February, 2017

Extra Treat Figures Team Efficiency 2016. Guess Where the Patriots and Flacons were?

Image
Sometimes my figures get so pretty that I got to share with the world.

Love Love my Team Efficiency Figure based on my Data going into my Textbook!

Enjoy



2013 to 2016 Seasonal Averages of Player's PF* _____ *(my performance figure. I do I weekly calculation with the position and scaled players production to a scale of 0 to 100).

Image
Working my Chapter 13 Data in my Textbook on Drafting. Shooting for the 2017 first edition in May on Amazon.  

I guess I am excited as I go through the data and wanted to share some fun facts for your 2017 Drafting. Let your mind flow through the data! Enjoy!

FYI- The PF* is my performance figure. I do I weekly calculation with the position and scaled players production to a scale of 0 to 100. Thus you can compare all players together. 

*This is a great weekly advantage that the "other" sites can not deliver 

In my Textbook I will have the complete weekly PF look into the 2016 17 week season! Below is the Seasonal average of PF for each major player! 

****  These PFs make great TIER Boundaries ****




















One figure from my Chapter 6 in my textbook due May 2017. 2016 RB and WR positions in terms of scaled to average of EOS PF vs PS ADP levels

Image
Working my Chapter 6 Data in my Textbook on Drafting. Shooting for the 2017 first edition in May on Amazon.  

I guess I am excited as I go through the data and wanted to share some fun facts for your 2017 Drafting.

Figure 42 in my Chapter 6 focuses attention on a comparison between the 2016 RB and WR positions in terms of scaled to average. We can now define success as above the average, positive numbers. Negative numbers will note failures. This figure contains the numbers of successes above the average over the 48th RBs and WRs. The dashed black line denoted the success failure breakpoint. The rounds are divided by the pink dotted lines. The actual positions and their successes are displayed within each round.

The two patterns numerically are; RBs 8, 8, 3 and 7 successes and WRs are 8, 9, 6 and 3 successes.

The y-axis is the scaled End of Season Performance (Dec 2016) vs the preseason ADP level (Sept 2016)

I conclude that in 2016;
The WRs were best early and riskier later. The RBs we…

2016 ADP (180th ADP or Less) Sept 2016 vs End of Season Fantasy Points Scored

Image
FYI
Working on updating my Textbook on drafting and have been drilling down deep into the data.  Here is the first figure and draft write up for my Chapter 6 redo in my Drafting Textbook.  ===============================Chapter 6. Clues for Drafting; ADP vs. Seasonal Player Performance
I analyzed the relationship of the QB, RB, TE, and WR players ranked by their pre-season ADP (PS-ADP to about the 180th player number – total position except DEF and K) and their end-of-season long PPR points scored (ES PPR) to determine how strong the finish was for each position PS-ADP vs. the ES-PPR. The first figure of this data of the PS-ADP vs. ES-PPR from the years 2016 is presented in Figure 36.
The first quest was to determine what was the differences in the players on an ADP draft list 180th or less or players greater than a 180th ADP level.  (ADP 2016 and earlier historical data is available free at several websites, I randomly picked one and used it through the chapter)
In Figure 36 in the top…